May’s lawyer shares details from Yul Edochie’s defense where he claimed he was only acting skits with Judy and they were never married.
Mr Ugwuonye who is May’s representative for her divorce case with Yul had sent a petition to Yul for divorce on behalf of his client.
Yul refuted the allegations of a traditional marriage between himself and Judy, claiming they were only Skitmakers like Sabinus.
May initially wanted to take him to court for bigamy, which is marrying another wife without her knowledge, a very serious crime according to the law.
Upon hearing that Yul can be remanded in jail for that offense, she opted for a divorce and also sued Judy on the grounds of adultery.
Yul in his defense further claimed his alleged marriage to Judy were all lies by the blog Gistlover, to ruin him for social media traffic and financial gains.
May’s lawyer noted that the skit making between the two has led to the birth of two children and they are currently expecting a third.
The allegation by May Edochie against Yul and Judy and their response below;
“MAY: Petition (10) xviii.
The Respondent (Yul) left Lagos for Enugu the following day, 21st ofApril, 2022, a Thursday and on Sunday, the 24h of April, 2022, the Petitioner found out again on social media (Gistlover Blog) that the Respondent was performing traditional marriage rites with the Party Cited (Judy) in her home town in Anambra State as at when the information was posted. (The Petitioner shall rely on the said publication at the trial of this suit.
YUL’S RESPONSE:
The Respondent (Yul) categorically denies paragraph 10 (xviii) of the petition and states that the said Gistlover blog publication was false and fuelled by gistlover’s enterprise in fake news and chaos.
That since the news of the birth of the Respondent’s child with the Co-Respondent in June 2021, Gistlover as a negative blog that thrive in fake and manipulated information for financial gains has been negatively exploiting every movie or skit featuring the Respondent & Co-Respondent and generating social media traffic for financial benefits therefrom. The Respondent hereby puts the Petitioner to the strictest proofthereof.
JUDY’S RESPONSE:
9.The Co-Respondent (Judy) categorically denies paragraph 10 (xviii) &(xix) of the petition and states that the said Gistlover blog nevicationas. There was no traditional mariage ceremony between the Respondent and the Co-Respondent (Yul and Judy) on the 24th day of April 2022 or any other date whatsoever. The Co-Respondent hereby puts the Petitioner to the strictest proof thereof.”
See the post below…..
