Emefiele’s counsel, Mr Olalekan Ojo (SAN) did not object.
But Omoile’s counsel, Mr Adeyinka Kotoye (SAN), objected and argued that the documents had no basis in law.
According to Kotoye, a document not tendered as an exhibit, should not be tendered at all.
Oyedepo, in his response, argued that the documents were relevant and would prove essential ingredients of the offences.
“The documents are for the purpose of identification,” he said.
Justice Rahman Oshodi, admitted the bundles of documents for identification purpose, after considering the parties submissions.
Oshodi adjourned the case until Dec. 10 for cross-examination of the witness.